Search for: All records

Integrating single-cell multi-omics data is a challenging task that has led to new insights into complex cellular systems. Various computational methods have been proposed to effectively integrate these rapidly accumulating datasets, including deep learning. However, despite the proven success of deep learning in integrating multi-omics data and its better performance over classical computational methods, there has been no systematic study of its application to single-cell multi-omics data integration. To fill this gap, we conducted a literature review to explore the use of multimodal deep learning techniques in single-cell multi-omics data integration, taking into account recent studies from multiple perspectives. Specifically, we first summarized different modalities found in single-cell multi-omics data. We then reviewed current deep learning techniques for processing multimodal data and categorized deep learning-based integration methods for single-cell multi-omics data according to data modality, deep learning architecture, fusion strategy, key tasks and downstream analysis. Finally, we provided insights into using these deep learning models to integrate multi-omics data and better understand single-cell biological mechanisms.

 

Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1A) is a transcription factor (TF) that forms highly structural and functional protein–protein interactions with other TFs to promote gene expression in hypoxic cancer cells. However, despite the importance of these TF-TF interactions, we still lack a comprehensive view of many of the TF cofactors involved and how they cooperate. In this study, we systematically studied HIF1A cofactors in eight cancer cell lines using the computational motif mining tool, SIOMICS, and discovered 201 potential HIF1A cofactors, which included 21 of the 29 known HIF1A cofactors in public databases. These 201 cofactors were statistically and biologically significant, with 19 of the top 37 cofactors in our study directly validated in the literature. The remaining 18 were novel cofactors. These discovered cofactors can be essential to HIF1A’s regulatory functions and may lead to the discovery of new therapeutic targets in cancer treatment.

 

The authors of the BASiNET tool claim that the survey paper ‘A systematic evaluation of computational tools for lncRNA identification’ incorrectly evaluates the BASiNET tool. Here, we point out that the survey paper correctly evaluates the BASiNET tool and why the evaluation should not be carried out as BASiNET authors suggest.

 

Accurate identification of microRNA (miRNA) targets at base-pair resolution has been an open problem for over a decade. The recent discovery of miRNA isoforms (isomiRs) adds more complexity to this problem. Despite the existence of many methods, none considers isomiRs, and their performance is still suboptimal. We hypothesize that by taking the isomiR–mRNA interactions into account and applying a deep learning model to study miRNA–mRNA interaction features, we may improve the accuracy of miRNA target predictions. We developed a deep learning tool called DMISO to capture the intricate features of miRNA/isomiR–mRNA interactions. Based on tenfold cross-validation, DMISO showed high precision (95%) and recall (90%). Evaluated on three independent datasets, DMISO had superior performance to five tools, including three popular conventional tools and two recently developed deep learning-based tools. By applying two popular feature interpretation strategies, we demonstrated the importance of the miRNA regions other than their seeds and the potential contribution of the RNA-binding motifs within miRNAs/isomiRs and mRNAs to the miRNA/isomiR–mRNA interactions.

 

Cell–cell interactions (CCIs) are essential for multicellular organisms to coordinate biological processes and functions. One classical type of CCI interaction is between secreted ligands and cell surface receptors, i.e. ligand-receptor (LR) interactions. With the recent development of single-cell technologies, a large amount of single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data has become widely available. This data availability motivated the single-cell-resolution study of CCIs, particularly LR-based CCIs. Dozens of computational methods and tools have been developed to predict CCIs by identifying LR-based CCIs. Many of these tools have been theoretically reviewed. However, there is little study on current LR-based CCI prediction tools regarding their performance and running results on public scRNA-Seq datasets. In this work, to fill this gap, we tested and compared nine of the most recent computational tools for LR-based CCI prediction. We used 15 well-studied scRNA-Seq samples that correspond to approximately 100K single cells under different experimental conditions for testing and comparison. Besides briefing the methodology used in these nine tools, we summarized the similarities and differences of these tools in terms of both LR prediction and CCI inference between cell types. We provided insight into using these tools to make meaningful discoveries in understanding cell communications.

 

Abstract Background It is still challenging to predict interacting enhancer-promoter pairs (IEPs), partially because of our limited understanding of their characteristics. To understand IEPs better, here we studied the IEPs in nine cell lines and nine primary cell types. Results By measuring the bipartite clustering coefficient of the graphs constructed from these experimentally supported IEPs, we observed that one enhancer is likely to interact with either none or all of the target genes of another enhancer. This observation implies that enhancers form clusters, and every enhancer in the same cluster synchronously interact with almost every member of a set of genes and only this set of genes. We perceived that an enhancer can be up to two megabase pairs away from other enhancers in the same cluster. We also noticed that although a fraction of these clusters of enhancers do overlap with super-enhancers, the majority of the enhancer clusters are different from the known super-enhancers. Conclusions Our study showed a new characteristic of IEPs, which may shed new light on distal gene regulation and the identification of IEPs. 

Abstract The computational identification of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is important to study lncRNAs and their functions. Despite the existence of many computation tools for lncRNA identification, to our knowledge, there is no systematic evaluation of these tools on common datasets and no consensus regarding their performance and the importance of the features used. To fill this gap, in this study, we assessed the performance of 17 tools on several common datasets. We also investigated the importance of the features used by the tools. We found that the deep learning-based tools have the best performance in terms of identifying lncRNAs, and the peptide features do not contribute much to the tool accuracy. Moreover, when the transcripts in a cell type were considered, the performance of all tools significantly dropped, and the deep learning-based tools were no longer as good as other tools. Our study will serve as an excellent starting point for selecting tools and features for lncRNA identification. 

Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation and phenotype development. Understanding the regulation of miRNA genes is critical to understand gene regulation. One of the challenges to study miRNA gene regulation is the lack of condition-specific annotation of miRNA transcription start sites (TSSs). Unlike protein-coding genes, miRNA TSSs can be tens of thousands of nucleotides away from the precursor miRNAs and they are hard to be detected by conventional RNA-Seq experiments. A number of studies have been attempted to computationally predict miRNA TSSs. However, high-resolution condition-specific miRNA TSS prediction remains a challenging problem. Recently, deep learning models have been successfully applied to various bioinformatics problems but have not been effectively created for condition-specific miRNA TSS prediction. Here we created a two-stream deep learning model called D-miRT for computational prediction of condition-specific miRNA TSSs ( http://hulab.ucf.edu/research/projects/DmiRT/ ). D-miRT is a natural fit for the integration of low-resolution epigenetic features (DNase-Seq and histone modification data) and high-resolution sequence features. Compared with alternative computational models on different sets of training data, D-miRT outperformed all baseline models and demonstrated high accuracy for condition-specific miRNA TSS prediction tasks. Comparing with the most recent approaches on cell-specific miRNA TSS identification using cell lines that were unseen to the model training processes, D-miRT also showed superior performance.